Wednesday, April 08, 2009

World War I

Marshall, S.L.A., and Alvin M. Josephy. The American Heritage History of World War I. [New York]: American Heritage Pub. Co.; Book trade distribution by Simon and Schuster, 1964.

This short history of the First World War (at 483 pages, it only scratches the surface) is an especially good analysis of how the conflagration began and how the criminally inept peace imposed by the victors inevitably led to the Second World War and various other evils. It treats the major battles in a very sparse way, so that it is difficult to learn any more of them than who was engaged, how many died, and how little land was won or lost for such bloody sacrifice. For greater detail on what being in a WWI battle was like, I much prefer Keegan's chapter on the Somme from The Face of Battle. Also, General "Slam" Marshall, being an American, definitely wrote a great deal more detail about the doings of the American Expeditionary Force in France than any other nation's armed forces. For example, he mentions which American divisions fought in each battle, but hardly ever speaks of formations smaller than armies when writing of French, British, German, or Russian battles. I suppose this is all right, but it definitely means one must read elsewhere for the whole story.

All in all, a good book. The political analysis I mentioned above is excellent. The military side is less so. But several questions still remain in my mind: How did men decide to continue sacrificing themselves at the rate they did, and for so little in return, on the Western Front? Why did the armies not simply refuse their leaders when called upon for the umpteenth time to charge machine gun nests through a hail of shrapnel? It seems to me that, for a time, everyone lost their minds! I hope and pray that nothing similar ever happens again.

2 comments:

Lydia said...

Do you think we've learned from our mistakes about the peace agreements at the end of the war?

Jon Norvell said...

I think so, yes. The harsh peace imposed at the end of WWI was not repeated after WWII. It might have something to do with the need for strong Germany and Japan to help hold back Soviet aggression, but I think lessons were also learned. The Romans knew, thousands of years ago, that you cannot afford to bring a defeated enemy to his/her knees without expecting them to exact vengeance. Too sad that world leaders (Wilson, Clemenceau, George, Orlando, etc.) were either too stary-eyed in their hopes for world peace or too hard-hearted in their search for revenge to see that same point.